In an effort to facilitate case management and to reduce litigation expenses, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board permits certain motions to be hear via telephone conference.  These include motions in the pleading phase, discovery phase, and/or the trial phase of a trademark opposition or trademark cancellation proceeding.

Examples of motions that the board may dispose of by way of telephone conference include:

  • motions to extend deadlines
  • motions to suspend proceedings
  • disputes regarding interrogatory numbers and limitations
  • motions to compel the attendance of a witness at deposition
  • motions to quash a notice of deposition

The availability of telephone conferences is not limited to motion practice. Additional matters that the parties might want to consider bringing before the board by phone include disputes involving:

  • the right of priority to obtain discovery multiple discovery responses where a narrowing of the issues is warranted; and
  • matters where board guidance would be helpful in interpreting the rules of practice before the trademark trial and appeal Board.

Parties are encouraged to take advantage of the Board’s willingness to expedite matters by phone.  While it may not be effective for all matters, the resolution of disputes by phone are in the best interest of all parties, particularly when decisions on formal written motions take approximately 3-4 months to be resolved.

Futher information on the Board’s telephone conferencing dispute mechanism may be found on the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board website of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Hastings James Hastings

James Hastings is an attorney with the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Practice Group of Practus, LLP.  He is a certified mediator of the INTA Panel of Mediators, an international roster of select professionals with expertise in trademark dispute resolution.

James is…

James Hastings is an attorney with the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Practice Group of Practus, LLP.  He is a certified mediator of the INTA Panel of Mediators, an international roster of select professionals with expertise in trademark dispute resolution.

James is the publisher of Trademark Opposition Lawyer, an online advisory dedicated to helping brand owners understand important issues that arise in proceedings before the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.  His commentary has been featured on Corporate Counsel, Law.com, LegalZoom,and other digital publications.

He devotes his practice to trademark opposition and trademark cancellation proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  Over the course of his career, he has represented the interests of numerous national and international brand owners in trademark litigation matters in both the U.S. District Courts and before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Prior to his current affiliation with Practus, LLP, James was in-house counsel to a New England-based catalog retailer, where he was responsible for developing trademark portfolio acquisition, protection, and licensing strategies.  Earlier in his career, he was a partner and associate at intellectual property law firms in New York, where he was engaged in trademark portfolio and intellectual property protection work on behalf of well-known fashion and personal care brands.

James is a member of the New York and Connecticut bars.  He has lectured at University MBA programs and legal education conferences on the issues of trademark protection and e-commerce law.

Past and Present Membership

  • International Trademark Association
  • Association Corporate Counsel
  • National E-tailing and Mail Order Organization of America