More than 5,000 trademark oppositions are filed every year.
One of the grounds for bringing a trademark opposition is that the application is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s preexisting trademark.
Yet many trademark opposers are unsuccessful and have their cases dismissed.
So prior to filing a notice of opposition, it is advisable
Not all trademark opposition proceedings proceed to a final decision. In fact, the vast majority of trademark opposition disputes are resolved between the parties or involve trademark mediation. Estimates are that over 90% of cases before the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board amicably settled before trial.
Short of the cost and expense of
For purposes of likelihood of confusion, not all beverage trademarks are created equal.
In Patrón Spirits International AG v. Conyngham Brewing Company, the Applicant sought registration of the mark PIRATE PISS for “beer, ale, and lager” in International Class 32. Opposer Patron had opposed the application based on its ownership of the previously registered
We recently spoke with Thomas Huthwaite, senior associate at Baldwins, to discuss New Zealand trademark protection issues. Thomas has been named as “one to watch’” by the Legal 500 Asia-Pacific.
Please tell us a little about your trademark and brand protection practice.
I am a New Zealand barrister and solicitor, and registered Patent Attorney. Since
We recently spoke with Blake Knowles, partner at Cullen’s, to discuss Australia trademark protection issues.
1. Please tell us a little about your background and brand protection experience.
Since joining Cullens, I have been responsible for managing, protecting and enforcing the trademark portfolios of several successful and well known Australian and overseas companies. I
The U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board recently found no likelihood of confusion between two apparel marks.
In Manhattan International Trade, Inc. and Pure & Simple Concepts, Inc. v. Industrie IP Party, Limited, the Applicant sought to register the design mark FINEST QUALITY GARMENT MAKERS INDUSTRIE TURN OF THE CENTURY CLOTHING EST 1999 for clothing.
A recent trademark opposition case before the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board presents a discussion of priority based on common law rights.
In Mazama Brewing Company, LLC v. Sumerian Brewing Company, LLC, Applicant sought registration of the mark HOPRUPTION DOUBLE IPA for beer in Class 32. Opposer brought a motion for partial summary judgment
Trademark oppositions in the United States are, on average, the most expensive in the world. So what does it take to protect and enforce brands in other countries?
Over the coming months, some of the world’s leading trademark professionals will be sharing with us insight on the trademark opposition process in their own jurisdictions. By
The U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has disclosed first and second quarter filing and pendency statistics for 2018. Year to date (YTD) statistics as compared to the same period in 2017 include the following:
U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board filings
Many trademark attorneys believe that the goal of a TTAB discovery conference is to zealously prepare for litigation. A better approach is to view it through the lens of a favorable settlement outcome. Since over 90% of trademark oppositions settle prior to trial, it makes sense to do so.
According to U.S. Trademark Trial and