To a trademark opposer, the filing of a trademark opposition is a serious matter with an uncertain outcome.  If an opposer loses a trademark opposition case, the trademarks on which it is relying to bring the opposition can be further weakened.  On the other hand, if a trademark applicant loses a trademark opposition then the application will be rejected, further jeopardizing the applicant’s plans to use the trademark on certain products and services.  Therefore, for both opposer and applicant, a trademark opposition poses unwanted risks to their respective trademarks that perhaps could be avoided by settling the case.

When is the Best Time to Settle a Trademark Opposition?

Generally, there are three (3) opportune times to attempt to settle a trademark dispute with another party:  These include:

  • Prior to the Filing of the Trademark Opposition – once a trademark cease and desist letter is served;
  • Prior to an Answer Being Filed –  the trademark applicant might consider first contacting the Opposer to determine what are their business reasons for filing the trademark opposition and whether some sort of Agreement can be reached without the need for litigation
  • During the Mandatory Settlement Conference– the parties to a trademark opposition proceeding are required to “meet and confer” – almost always by phone, to discuss the facts and allegations of the dispute and to determine whether a settlement may be achieved.  This conference takes place after the filing of the Answer during the early stages of the case

Remember that in trademark opposition cases, timing is everything.  Knowing when and how to approach your opponent to discuss settlement is best left to an experienced trademark opposition attorney.  This could make the difference between a long, protracted litigation and one that gets resolved quickly.

 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Hastings James Hastings

James Hastings is an attorney with the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Practice Group of Practus, LLP.  He is a certified mediator of the INTA Panel of Mediators, an international roster of select professionals with expertise in trademark dispute resolution.

James is…

James Hastings is an attorney with the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Practice Group of Practus, LLP.  He is a certified mediator of the INTA Panel of Mediators, an international roster of select professionals with expertise in trademark dispute resolution.

James is the publisher of Trademark Opposition Lawyer, an online advisory dedicated to helping brand owners understand important issues that arise in proceedings before the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.  His commentary has been featured on Corporate Counsel, Law.com, LegalZoom,and other digital publications.

He devotes his practice to trademark opposition and trademark cancellation proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  Over the course of his career, he has represented the interests of numerous national and international brand owners in trademark litigation matters in both the U.S. District Courts and before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Prior to his current affiliation with Practus, LLP, James was in-house counsel to a New England-based catalog retailer, where he was responsible for developing trademark portfolio acquisition, protection, and licensing strategies.  Earlier in his career, he was a partner and associate at intellectual property law firms in New York, where he was engaged in trademark portfolio and intellectual property protection work on behalf of well-known fashion and personal care brands.

James is a member of the New York and Connecticut bars.  He has lectured at University MBA programs and legal education conferences on the issues of trademark protection and e-commerce law.

Past and Present Membership

  • International Trademark Association
  • Association Corporate Counsel
  • National E-tailing and Mail Order Organization of America